Why is Linux not widely used?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/168df/168dfdd31afc429f548fa3bce85639af46a9d003" alt=""
That being said, MS under Nadella is a completely different beast, it’s all about service sales, they are now more a service delivery than a software company, and those revenues make up a huge chunk of their income. As such their only use for developer ecosystem is to up-sell their services. If your product is not about selling or paying for their services, well, su*ks to be you, you get relegated to a slower or a crawling lane and are made to suffer through innate badgering of ecstatic fanbois explaining you how stupid you are not to see the light that is new MS. For years now they are cramming Azure and this crippled UWP (omg, could it be more stupid and ugly) architecture down our throats in continual attempts to revamp their marketplace and mobile platform, while somehow thinking that we will all line up as sheeple so that they could take service fees from us. It obviously hasn’t materialized, and it probably never will. So there is a huge vacuum forming in disgruntled MS dev ecosystem, which seriously gained momentum with MS killing Silverlight overnight. A vacuum that Linux could fill up by say making Mono as fast as MS JIT and porting the WPF, for start, and say making Libre Office not look like it’s made for Windows 3.11. If only they could realize what made MS great before instead of reducing it to MS hating arguments expecting people to love what they love. People are the key, and most people are not Linux geeks. So, Windows perseveres through sheer inertia.
No comments